Cost of surgical management of laparoscopically treated ectopic pregnancies at a tertiary referral hospital: A 10-year review of admission costs and contributing factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v37i2.326Keywords:
Ectopic pregnancy, Cost of admission, surgery, laparoscopicAbstract
Background: Laparoscopic management is the gold standard for treating ectopic pregnancies (EP), but its cost limits its widespread use in developing nations. A 10-year period audit was conducted evaluating laparoscopically treated EPs at a tertiary referral hospital, focusing on admission cost and contributing factors.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital. All women admitted with surgically managed Eps were included. Analysis of data was done against a preset checklist. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were computed and presented in tables and figures.
Results: The adjusted admission cost for patients with surgically managed EP ranged from US $2 017 (KES 220 252) to US $ 6,326 (KES 690 828). The mean cost of admission was US $ 3 254 (KES 355 384; n=259). The following factors were significantly associated with an increased admission cost: increasing patient age (p=0.000), volume of hemoperitoneum(p=0.000) duration of surgery (p=0.003) and duration of hospital stay (p=0.000).
Conclusion: The mean admission cost for surgically managed EP was similar to that in high-income countries. However, when adjusted for per capita gross domestic product, the cost was disproportionately high. No consistent decline in the mean annual cost was observed over the study period. Increasing patient age, hemoperitoneum volume, surgery duration, and duration of hospital stay all significantly impacted on the admission cost.
References
KNBS IC. Kenya demographic and health survey 2022. Nairobi, Kenya, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: KNBS and ICF. 2023
Al Naimi A, Moore P, Brüggmann D, Krysa L, Louwen F, Bahlmann F. Ectopic pregnancy: a single-center experience over ten years. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19(1):79. Published 2021 Jun 1. doi:10.1186/s12958-021-00761-w
Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(2):e65-e77. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002464
Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21 [published correction appears in BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):e314. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14983.]. BJOG. 2016;123(13):e15-e55. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14189
Chaudhary P, Manchanda R, Patil VN. Retrospective study on laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63(3):173-176. doi:10.1007/s13224-012-0304-z
Meena J, Vatsa R, Kumar S, Roy KK, Yadav A, Singhal S. Feasibility of laparoscopy in management of ectopic pregnancy: experience from a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018 May 1;7(5):1778-82
Stulberg DB, Cain LR, Dahlquist I, Lauderdale DS. Ectopic pregnancy rates and racial disparities in the Medicaid population, 2004-2008. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1671-1676. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.031
Foulk RA, Steiger RM. Operative management of ectopic pregnancy: a cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):90-96. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70256-9
Namavar Jahromi B, Fardid M, Esmaili E, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Methods of Treatment of Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy in the South of Iran. Value Health Reg Issues. 2022;28:90-97. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2021.06.004
Mol F, van Mello NM, Strandell A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial). Hum Reprod. 2015;30(9):2038-2047. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev162
Morlock RJ, Lafata JE, Eisenstein D. Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(3):407-412. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00548-7
Lecuru F, Robin F, Chasset S, Leonard F, Guitti S, Taurelle R. Direct cost of single dose methotrexate for unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Prospective comparison with laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;88(1):1-6. doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00125-6
Creanga AA, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Bish CL, Zane S, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM. Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980-2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):837-843. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182113c10
Dialani V, Levine D. Ectopic pregnancy: a review. Ultrasound Q. 2004;20(3):105-117. doi:10.1097/00013644-200409000-00005
Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(1):CD000324. Published 2007 Jan 24. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000324.pub2
Minig L, Velazco A, Lamm M, Velez JI, Venturini NC, Testa R. Evaluation of laparoscopic management of gynecologic emergencies by residents. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(1):62-67. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.006
Mullany K, Minneci M, Monjazeb R, C Coiado O. Overview of ectopic pregnancy diagnosis, management, and innovation. Womens Health (Lond). 2023;19:17455057231160349. doi:10.1177/17455057231160349
Hamamci EO, Besim H, Bostanoglu S, Sonişik M, Korkmaz A. Use of laparoscopic splenectomy in developing countries: analysis of cost and strategies for reducing cost. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12(4):253-258. doi:10.1089/109264202760268023
Udwadia TE, Udwadia RT, Menon K, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in the developing world. An overview of the Indian scene. Int Surg. 1995;80(4):371-375.
Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J, Maine R. Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2
Alexander JM, Rouse DJ, Varner E, Austin JM Jr. Treatment of the small unruptured ectopic pregnancy: a cost analysis of methotrexate versus laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(1):123-127. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00086-5
WorldBank. GDP per capita (current US$) - World| Data [Internet]. Worldbank.org. Worldbank.org.: World Bank; 2022 [updated 2022; cited 2023 27th December]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=KE
Mann LM, Kreisel K, Llata E, Hong J, Torrone EA. Trends in Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnoses in United States Emergency Departments, 2006-2013. Matern Child Health J. 2020;24(2):213-221. doi:10.1007/s10995-019-02842-0
Atri M, Leduc C, Gillett P, et al. Role of endovaginal sonography in the diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics. 1996;16(4):755-775. doi:10.1148/radiographics.16.4.8835969
Comstock C, Huston K, Lee W. The ultrasonographic appearance of ovarian ectopic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):42-45. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000148271.27446.30
Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC. Endovaginal sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(6):1181-1186. doi:10.2214/ajr.149.6.1181
Jurkovic D, Mavrelos D. Catch me if you scan: ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(1):1-7. doi:10.1002/uog.4077
Agdi M, Tulandi T. Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(4):519-527. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.12.009
Takacs P, Chakhtoura N. Laparotomy to laparoscopy: changing trends in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(3):175-177. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.01.007
Creinin MD, Washington AE. Cost of ectopic pregnancy management: surgery versus methotrexate. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(6):963-969
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Steve Mutiso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.